This article discusses results from a research project which set out to investigate gender differences in the nature and experience of bullying within the higher education sector. Gender differences emerged in the form and perception of bullying as well as in target responses. Results also indicate that, irrespective of gender, bullies can capture and subvert organizational structures and procedures (such as official hierarchies, mentoring systems and probationary reviews) to further their abuse of the target and to conceal their aggressive intent. These outcomes are discussed in relation to gendered assumptions behind management practices and in relation to the masculinist ethic that underpins many higher education management initiatives. Overall, results indicate that bullying cannot be divorced from gender and that such behaviour needs to be seen in a gendered context.
Simpson, R., & Cohen, C. (2004). Dangerous work: The gendered nature of bullying in the context of higher education. Gender, Work & Organization, 11(2), 163-186.
Related media
-
Al Jazeerah Investigates: Degrees of Abuse
- I experienced
A podcast series on how British universities handle complaints on sexual misconduct.
Read more -
Dit zijn de zes vormen van intimidatie waar hoogleraren onder lijden
- I witnessed
A radio interview with Hanneke Takkenberg on the LNVH report on Harassment in academia, by Ghislaine Plag on 'Spraakmakers' (NPO Radio 1).
Read more -
Professorale Pestkoppen
- I witnessed
An article on how social safety practices at Dutch universities can sometimes exacerbate the problems of misconduct.
Read more